fa مرجع صالح رفع اختلاف دستگاه‌های اجرایی تخصصي Special پژوهشي Research <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span lang="FA" style="font-family:&quot;B Mitra&quot;"><span style="color:black">به استناد اصل 134ق.ا در موارد اختلاف‌نظر و یا تداخل در وظایف قانونی دستگاه‌های دولتی در صورتی</span></span> <span lang="FA" style="font-family:&quot;B Mitra&quot;"><span style="color:black">که نیاز به تفسیر یا تغییر قانون نداشته باشد، تصمیم هیأت وزیران که به پیشنهاد رئیس جمهور اتخاذ می‌شود لازم‌الاجرا است. دولت نیز به موجب&nbsp; اصل 138 ق.ا اجازه یافته تصویب برخی از امور مربوط به وظایف خود را به کمیسیون‌های متشکل</span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-family:&quot;B Mitra&quot;"><span style="color:black"> از چند وزیر واگذار نماید. بر همین اساس آیین‌نامه چگونگی رفع اختلاف دستگاه‌های اجرایی به تصویب وزیران عضو کمیسیون لوایح و در تاریخ 26/12/1386 به تأیید ریاست جمهوری رسیده و جهت اجراء ابلاغ شده است. نظر به اهمیت موضوع صلاحیت دادرسی و تشتت آراء مراجع قضایی در این خصوص این مقاله با روش توصیفی </span></span><span lang="FA" style="color:black">&ndash;</span><span lang="FA" style="font-family:&quot;B Mitra&quot;"><span style="color:black"> تحلیلی درصدد پاسخگویی به این پرسش است که مرجع صالح رسیدگی به اختلافات دستگاه‌های اجرایی کدام مرجع است؟ </span></span></span></span></span></span><br> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span lang="FA" style="font-family:&quot;B Mitra&quot;"><span style="color:black">به نظر می‌رسد با لحاظ اصول 134 ، 138 و 159 ق.1 مرجع رسیدگی به اختلافات با ماهیت اجرایی هیأت وزیران و رسیدگی به اختلافات با ماهیت قضایی مراجع عمومی دادگستری است.</span></span></span></span></span></span><br> &nbsp; <span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="letter-spacing:-.2pt">According to Article 134 of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in cases of disagreement or interference in the legal duties of government institutions, if there is no need to interpret or change the law, the decision of the Council of Ministers, which is adopted on the proposal of the President, is valid. According to Article 138 of QA, the government is allowed to leave the approval of some matters related to its duties to commissions made up of several ministers. The approvals of these commissions within the limits of the laws are valid after the approval of the president. Based on this, the regulations on how to resolve disputes between executive agencies through the internal mechanisms of the executive branch, based on the proposal of the legal deputy and affairs of the president&#39;s parliament and based on the principles of 134 and 138 of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved by the ministers who are members of the laws commission and on 26/12/ 1386 has been approved by the presidency and has been notified for implementation. Also, paragraph b of article 117 of the law of the seventh plan of the dispute resolution mechanism of executive bodies has been approved by the legislator. Therefore, the general competence of the judiciary in dealing with complaints and grievances subject to Article 159 of QA has been assigned by Article 134 of QA. Considering the disparity of opinions and decisions of the judicial authorities regarding the authority of the dispute resolution authorities of the executive bodies, this research intends to refer to the principles of the constitution and the interpretive opinions of the Guardian Council, approved laws and regulations, circulars and opinions and decisions of the judicial authorities and especially the decision Finally, the specialized board of administrative and public affairs of the court of administrative justice, dated 12/6/1998, clarified the scope of jurisdiction of each of the judicial and executive powers in resolving disputes between executive bodies, taking into account the different nature of executive, legal and other disputes, and the competent authority for resolving disputes between executive bodies specify</span></span></span></span></span><br> &nbsp; صلاحیت, هیأت وزیران, رفع اختلاف دستگاه اجرایی, محاکم عمومی Intrinsic jurisdiction - Council of Ministers - dispute resolution - executive body - public courts 33 50 http://qjal.smtc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1373-3&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 vali rostami ولی رستمی 10031947532846007491 10031947532846007491 Yes seyedaliakbar montazeri سیدعلی اکبر منتظری 10031947532846007492 10031947532846007492 No