|
The Judicial Review of the Administrative Justice Court on the Nation's Exigency Council, Experts Parliament and Guardian Council's Regulations
|
| |
|
|
|
Abstract: (2677 Views) |
| In the legal system of Iran, one of the issues of disagreement, discussion about jurisdiction of the General board of Administrative Justice court In superintend the decisions of various agencies Including is Certified parliament (assembly of experts), guardian council and Nation's exigency council (assembly for recognition interest of state). These institutions, on the basis of their inherent duties, are in the process of establishing and adopting decisions that some of them are administrative modality. Considering the procedure of the type of attitude towards the decision of these bodies, the purpose of this article accordingly that in addition to clarifying the scope of jurisdiction rule-making of the legal system with a brief definition from political action, judicial action, legislative action and administrative action to review the duties of these institutions and assume that their administrative actions can be subject to judicial review. Because in terms of administrative Justice court, as a supreme judicial institution, has general qualification in administrative claims. Therefore, remark of article 12 the law of administrative Justice Court it seems criticism and principle of supervision of power that is closely related to the rule of law, the unannounced withdrawal unreason all the approvals of these bodies from the jurisdiction of the General board. Additionally, such exceptions to the jurisdiction of the general board are a violation of right of individuals to access the judicial bodies. |
|
| Keywords: Administrative Act, Rule-Making, Nation's Exigency Council, Experts Parliament, Guardian Council |
|
|
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
