:: Volume 10, Issue 33 (3-2023) ::
qjal 2023, 10(33): 87-108 Back to browse issues page
Effects of administrative act in Iran and Germany
Seyedmojib Dyanat , Koroush Ostovarsangari * , Hamid Zarabi
Abstract:   (1346 Views)
Administrative act is the primary core of administrative law. In this article, this concept is examined in German administrative law, which has one of the most complete and transparent laws in this field, and in Iranian administrative law, which does not have any laws in this regard. Here, the German Administrative Procedure Law is discussed as a general administrative law that includes the details and effects of administrative act, along with the state of Iranian administrative law, which is at the beginning of the codification process, in order to compare the two in order to explain the administrative act. to be used in Iran. According to the authors' analysis, the main difference between Iran and Germany's administrative law is in the basic definition of administrative act, which in German administrative law, administrative act include general order and arbitration acts. From the view of executive effects, these acts should be considered according to the state of the act, whether it is correct, defective or invalid. In German administrative law, the effects of administrative act are valid or objectionable according to the correctness or degree of defects. to be or it will be invalid, but in Iranian law, these acts are not clearly specified in the laws, and a theoretical discussion should be raised about it.
 
Keywords: Germany, effects of administrative act, Iran, administrative act, unilateral act
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Arnold R., Le contrôle juridictionnel des décisions administratives en Allemagne, AJDA, 2001 (traduit de l’allemand par Mathias Darras).
2. Arnold R., Rapport de l’Allemagne sur la justice administrative in l’Association des Conseils d’Etat et des juridictions suprêmes de l’:union: européenne, (www. Juradmine.eu).
3. German administrative procedure act
4. Goepper M. (2007) Rappoet national pour la Cour administrative fédérale d’Allemagne in Assemblée générale de l’aihja, l’Association internationale des hautes juridictions administratives, Bangkok.
5. Herbert G (Juge à la Cour administrative fédérale, Leipzig); Rapport de l'Allemagne à 8-Herbert G., Contrôle jurdictionnel des décisions administratives ; actes
6. Hermann Pünder (2013), German administrative procedure in a comparative perspective: Observations on the path to a transnational ius commune proceduralis in administrative law, Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law
7. Mahendra p.singh, (2001) , German administrative law in common law perspective,2ed.Berlin,Heidelberg,
8. Wade & Forsyth (2014), Administrative Law, Oxford university press, eleventh edition,

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 33 (3-2023) Back to browse issues page