|
The necessity of designing a comprehensive legal system to determine general judicial policies
|
Mohammadvazin Karimain   , Zahra Hadizadeh * |
|
|
|
Abstract: (1150 Views) |
The Expediency Discernment Council "on 5/2/1377" prioritized the titles of "judicial security" and "public rights". "General judicial policies" (on 28/7/1381), approved for the title of "judicial security"; However, there is no "permanent" general policy for the title of "public rights" in "Collection of General Policies of the System (until 16/08/1402)" regulated by the Secretariat of the Expediency Discernment Council. The general policy of each five-year development plan should also be a time cut from "permanent" general policies, and so, it cannot be considered as a substitute for permanent general policies. Even the titles of general policies and their prioritization need to be revised according to the changes that have occurred over time. Some of developments can be seen as practical changes in the content of some clauses of the "general judicial policies" (on 7/28/1381). Delays, inadequacies and lack of updating in the design of general policies were the motivation of the present research. Information was collected with library methods and information analysis was done with a combination of legal logic and public policy principles, with an open system approach and dynamic balance theory, and it was concluded that design The comprehensive legal system is necessary to determine general judicial policies.
|
|
| Keywords: public policy, open system approach, general judicial policies, comprehensive legal system, dynamic equilibrium theory. |
|
|
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
