Identifying and prioritizing the components of Good Governance in the Health Sector using Analytic Network Process and DEMATEL Methods

rajayee, zahra; nasrabadi, mohammadmehdi; banihashemi, seyedali; malekzadeh torkaman, parviz

doi:10.61186/qjal.10.34.37

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023)

qjal 2023, 10(34): 37-59

Back to browse issues page

Identifying and prioritizing the components of Good Governance in the Health Sector using Analytic Network Process and DEMATEL Methods

Zahra Rajayee

, Mohammadmehdi Nasrabadi

, Seyedali Banihashemi ^*

, Parviz Malekzadeh torkaman

Abstract: (597 Views)

Due to the importance of good governance components in the health sector, the purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize the components of good governance in Khorasan Razavi University of Medical Sciences from the perspective of experts. The present study is in the field of applied research in terms of purpose and in the field of quantitative and survey research in terms of data collection. In this study, the indicators of good governance of the World Bank, namely transparency, accountability, corruption control, participation, quality of regulations, and the effectiveness of maps and tasks were extracted. Also, the indicators of the standard questionnaire of Moradian et al. (2013), the indicators of the proposed program of the Minister to be presented to the parliament (2015), and the national document of the health sector in the fourth development plan were used in this field. The required data were collected through a questionnaire that was distributed among 15 experts. Finally, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method was used to perform the analyzes and the DEMATEL method and Super-Decision Software were used to determine the weight, importance of factors, prioritization of indicators, and the effectiveness and efficiency of the indicators. The results showed that the components of transparency with a weight of 0.312 won the first rank, accountability with a weight of 0.189 with a weight of 0.172, and the rank of corruption with a weight of 0.172 was ranked third among the components of good governance in the health sector. Also, the components of transparency, accountability, quality of regulations, and control of corruption are more effective than their effectiveness. Identifying and prioritizing the components of good governance and applying them at the level of health and treatment can help governments to achieve social justice and create equal opportunities and improve the level of indicators such as health.

Keywords: Good Governance, Health, DEMATEL Method, Analytic Network Process

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Alonazi, W. B. (2020). “The impact of emotional intelligence on job performance during COVID-19 crisis: A cross-sectional analysis”. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 749-757.

2. Bogue, R. J., Hall, C. H. & La Forgia. G. M. (2007). Hospital Governance in Latin America. Washington DC: World Bank.

3. Drigas, A., & Chara, P. (2020). “The need for emotional intelligence training education in critical and stressful situations: The case of Covid-19”. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 8, 20–35.

4. Duman, N. (2020). “Üniversite öğrencilerinde COVID-19 korkusu ve belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük”. The Journal of Social Science, 4(8), 426-437.

5. Erer, B. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 Fear on Employee Performance. Social Sciences, 10(4), 845-852.

6. Hong, P. K. (2017). Governance Issues in Health Financing. International Encyclopedia of Public Health, Second Edition, Oxford Academic Press.

7. Karakaş, M. (2020). “Covid-19 salgınının çok boyutlu sosyolojisi ve yeni normal meselesi”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(1), 541–573.

8. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2004). “Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. The World Bank Economic Review”, 18(2), 253-287.

9. Kavas, N.B., & Develi, A. (2020). “Çalışma yaşamındaki sorunlar bağlamında Covid-19 pandemisinin kadın sağlık çalışanları üzerindeki etkisi”. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 4(2), 84-112.

10. Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 1–8

11. Klomp, J. & De Haan, J. (2008). “Effects of governance on health: A cross‐national analysis of 101 countries”. Kyklos, 61(4), 599-614.

12. Lewis, M. (2006). Governance and corruption in public health care systems. Center for Global Development working paper, 78. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=984046 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.984046

13. Moreno, C., Wykes, T., Galderisi, S., Nordentoft, M., Crossley, N., Jones, N., … Arango, C. (2020). “How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic”. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(9), 813–824.

14. Müller, S., & Rau, H. (2021). “Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the covid-19 crisis”. Journal of Public Economics, 194, 1-32.

15. Satpathy, B., Muniapan, B. & Dass, M. (2013). “UNESCAP’s characteristics of good governance from the philosophy of Bhagavad-Gita and its contemporary relevance in the Indian context”. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management. 7(2), 192-212.

16. Tjaija, A., Sabir, M., Usman, M. H., & Samad, M. A. (2021). “Good hospital governance at the Indonesian hospital”. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 554-561.

17. Uddin, M. S., Haque, C. E. & Khan, M. N. (2021). “Good governance and local level policy implementation for disaster-risk-reduction: actual, perceptual and contested perspectives in coastal communities in Bangladesh”. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 30(2), 94-111.

18. UNESCAP. (2009). What Is Good Governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.

19. Volk, A. A., Brazil, K. J., Franklin-Luther, P., Dane, A. V., & Vaillancourt, T. (2021). “The influence of demographics and personality on COVID-19 coping in young adults”. Personality and Individua Differences, 168, 1-7.

20. Whitehead, B. R. (2021). “COVID-19 as a stressor: Pandemic expectations, perceived stress, and negative affect in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), e59–e64.

22. فصلنامه حقوق اداری

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.61186/qjal.10.34.37

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

rajayee Z, nasrabadi M, banihashemi S, malekzadeh torkaman P. Identifying and prioritizing the components of Good Governance in the Health Sector using Analytic Network Process and DEMATEL Methods. qjal 2023; 10 (34) :37-59
URL: http://qjal.smtc.ac.ir/article-1-1148-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660