[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023) ::
qjal 2023, 10(34): 135-161 Back to browse issues page
Identifying causal and effect corruption points: driving the improvement of the health of the administrative system
Hamed Mohammadi * , Hosein Ebrahimi
Abstract:   (731 Views)
The main goal of the research is to improve the health of the administrative system by identifying corruption points in one of the affiliated regions of Iran Gas Transmission. The research is applied research in terms of its purpose, descriptive research in terms of data collection and a mixed type in terms of method. The study is qualitative in that the interview method was used to identify corruption points and the quantitative sense it was used to analyze the data using the dimtel method. Findings of the research identified 19 points of corruption in the qualitative part and in the quantitative part among points of corruption, 13 points were determined as causal points and six points as disabled points. The results indicate that the identification of corruption points can be used as drivers of improving the health of the administrative system and the main step to control these points.
 
Keywords: administrative system health, corruption-prone points, administrative system, Improving health of administrative system, Iran gas transmission company.
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. 1. Atkinson C. L. (2021), “Theme Based Book Review: Shifting Views of Public Sector Corruption”. International Journal of Public Administration, Vil. 44, No. 3.
2. 2. Berman, E. (2021), Corruption in the Public Sector: An International Perspective, Emerald Publishing Limited Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley BD16 1WA, UK.
3. 3. Brollo F T. (2013), “The Political Resource Curse”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 5.
4. 4. Burukin V., Vezlomtsev V., Vezlomtseva S., Zvyagina A., and Sevalnev, V. (2021), “Structural analysis of consequences of corruption in the environmental sector in modern society”, E3S Web of Conferences 244, 1-9.
5. 5. Çetin S., Turan E., and Hamsioglu, O. (2019), “The Phenomenon of Corruption in Public Administration. 3rd International Congress on Political, Economic and Social Studies (ICPESS), 09-11 Nov.
6. 6. Darusalam D., and Janssen M. (2021), “The Influence of ICT on the Control of Corruption: A Study Using Panel Data from ASEAN Countries.” International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, Vol. 8, No. 1.
7. 7. Dragan O.V., Yermakova G.S., Chvaliuk A.M., Kurchin O.G., and Karagodin O. V. (2020), “Psychological Aspects of Corruption in Public Administration: Case-Study of Ukraine”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 9, No. 6.
8. 8. Gaspar V., and Hagan S. (2016), “Corruption: Costs and Mitigating Strategies, prepared by a Staff Team from the Fiscal Affairs Department and the Legal Department, IMF Staff Discussion Note, 1-30.
9. 9. Gillham B. (2000), The Research Interview, London, Rautledge.
10. 10. Graycar A., and Jancsics D. (2017), “Gift Giving and Corruption”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.40, No. 12.
11. 11. Hoinaru R., Buda D., Borlea S.N., Văidean V.L., and Achim, M.V. (2020). The Impact of Corruption and Shadow Economy on the Economic and Sustainable Development, Do They “Sand the Wheels” or “Grease the Wheels”, Journal of Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 481.
12. 12. Huang C.Y., Shyu J.Z., and Tzeng, G.H. (2007)”, Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP mall industry”, Journal of Techovation, Vol. 27, No. 12.
13. 13. Khan A., and Krishnan S. (2019), “Conceptualizing the impact of corruption in national institutions and national stakeholder service systems on e-government maturity, Journal of Int. J. Inf. Manage, Vol.46, No. 1.
14. 14. Khan A., Kirshnan S., and Dhi A. (2021), Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research, Journal of Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 167, No. 4.
15. 15. Li Si S., Yue You X., Liu H.C., and Zhang P. (2018), ‘DEMATEL Technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodology and application, Journal of mathematical problems in engineering, Vol. 208, No. 3.
16. 16. Mazhar U., and Iftikhar K. (2021), “Corruption Accusations and Bureaucratic Performance, Journal of Evidence from Pakistan. Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4.
17. 17. Mohammadi H. (2019), “Identification of Corrosive points in Iranian gas industry, Journal of Administrative Law, Vol. 6, No. 19.
18. 18. Moldogaziev T.T., and Liu C. (2021), Public sector corruption and perceived government performance in transition, Journal of Governance, Vol. 34, No. 2.
19. 19. Mungiu-Pippidi A., and Hartmann T. (2019), ‘Corruption and Development: An Overview’, In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance.
20. 20. Quah J. (2021), ‘Breaking the cycle of failure in combating corruption in Asian countries’, Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2.
21. 21. Rubin H.J., and Rubin I.S. (2005), Qualitative Interviewing, London, Sage.
22. 22. Sahling J.H., Mikkelsen K.S., and Schuster C. (2018), Civil Service Management and Corruption: What We Know and What We Don’t, Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 2, No. 1.
23. 23. Sartor M.A., and Beamish P.W. (2019)”, Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 167, No. 4.
24. 24. Scholl W., and Schermuly C.C. (2020), “The Impact of Culture on Corruption, Gross Domestic Product, and Human Development”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 162, No. 2.
25. 25. Sulitzeanu-Kenan R., Tepe M., and Yair O. (2021), “Public-Sector Honesty and Corruption: Field Evidence from 40 Countries”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 1, No. 1.
26. 26. United Nations. (2019), Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on Public Institutions, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Public Sector Report 2019.
27. 27. World Bank. (2009), Anticorruption, World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.
28. 28. World Bank. (2015), www.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/ [Date of Access: 10.06.2015].
29. 29. World Bank. (2016). Anti-corruption.
30. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-corruption.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
mohammadi H, ebrahimi H. Identifying causal and effect corruption points: driving the improvement of the health of the administrative system. qjal 2023; 10 (34) :135-161
URL: http://qjal.smtc.ac.ir/article-1-1152-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حقوق اداری Administrative Law
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660