[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 18 (6-2019) ::
qjal 2019, 6(18): 243-265 Back to browse issues page
Feasibility of Supervision on Interpretive Competence of Judges in Light of New Supervision Methods in Administrative Law
Abstract:   (2183 Views)
The interpretive competence of judges has always been a point of conflict. Its advocates regard it as an essential and efficient institution contributing to dynamism of laws, which can bring the laws closer to political and legal requirements in keeping with social change. Its critics, however, reject it claiming it can undermine the rule of law, increase the danger of abuse and corruption, and infringe upon basic rights. Regardless of these criticisms, interpretation of law is an inseparable part of legal resources, procedure, and adaption of laws to actual claims. Therefore, the concern and focus of legal discussions must be on how to supervise and control this legal institution, rather than reject it. In the first step, it must be ensured that principles of accountability and rule of law are observed, and then a balance must be struck between the interpretation made by judges and the spirit of law, legal principles, and human and citizenship rights. The realization of this aspiration is subject to a two-stage solution. Stage one: familiarity with the special, fluid nature of judicial affairs, and admission of its fundamental difference from execution of laws by law enforcement institutions. Stage two: recognition of interpretive competence as a special legal institution, and envision of control, priori, and posteriori mechanisms based on recently developed methods of supervision in administrative law, such as soft law and network supervision. In and of itself, this requires a clear understanding of the nature, function, and procedure of the modern public law, and its differentiation from the classical public law, private law, and criminal law.
Keywords: interpretive competence, lack of legal determination, rule of law, supervision, legal principles, judge
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Feasibility of Supervision on Interpretive Competence of Judges in Light of New Supervision Methods in Administrative Law. qjal 2019; 6 (18) :243-265
URL: http://qjal.smtc.ac.ir/article-1-384-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 18 (6-2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حقوق اداری Administrative Law
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645