Analysis of supervision mechanism for delegation of enterprises in order to article 44 of constitution

abbasi, bijan; barari, akbar

doi:10.61186/qjal.10.34.85

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023)

qjal 2023, 10(34): 85-107

Back to browse issues page

Analysis of supervision mechanism for delegation of enterprises in order to article 44 of constitution

Bijan Abbasi

, Akbar Barari ^*

Abstract: (853 Views)

Although Privatization become a worldwide circulation of political and economic circles since last century but there are still basic disagreements on the mechanisms of its implementation and of course about the way of monitoring this process. In our country, though, the privatization and in particular privatization of state-owned enterprises goes back many years ago, but the culmination of this fundamental transformation comes from the general policies of article 44 of constitution and the law implementing it, which first addressed the issue of privatization in a comprehensive manner. Nevertheless success of the implementation of these policies has been in doubt for many years. This skepticism has become more pronounced, especially in relation to the corruption that has occurred in the area of divestiture and That is why the issue of overseeing oversight is important, Supervision is not just about choosing how to outsource state enterprises and In addition to discussing the preparation of firms (companies) for transfer, there is also a shadow over the post-transfer phase and Rather than merely changing the ownership of these firms, it has targeted the more fundamental goal of "increasing the private sector's share in the national economy" and ultimately accelerating the growth of the national economy.

Keywords: Supervision, Privatization, devolution, State enterprise, Article 44 General Policies.

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Noman Shaheer, Jingtao Yi, Sali Li and Liang Chen (2019) "State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment". Journal of Business Ethics, 159:1, 221-238

2. Ravi, Ramamurti. Raymond, Vernon (1991), Privatization and Control of State-Owned Enterprise, World Bank.

3. D. Andrew C. SmithMichael J. Trebilcock (2001), “State-Owned Enterprises in Less Developed Countries: Privatization and Alternative Reform Strategies”, European Journal of Law and Economics, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 217–252.

4. Jürgen G. Backhaus. “Assessing the performance of public enterprises: A public-choice approach”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 1994, vol.1, No. 4, pp. 275-287. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

5. Aivazian, V. A., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). “Can corporatization improve the performance of state-owned enterprises even without privatization?’ “Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(5), 791–808.

6. Charles,Vuylsteke. Techniques of privatization of state-owned enterprises. July 1989, publisher World Bank.

7. Bornstein, M. (2001). “Post-privatisation Enterprise Restructuring. Post-Communist Economies, Post-Communist Economies Journal, Volume 13, 2001 - Issue 2. 189–203

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.61186/qjal.10.34.85

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

abbasi B, barari A. Analysis of supervision mechanism for delegation of enterprises in order to article 44 of constitution. qjal 2023; 10 (34) :85-107
URL: http://qjal.smtc.ac.ir/article-1-1150-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 10, Issue 34 (7-2023)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660